Wolf, this discussion has no sense.

Read again this phrase :

"You know exactly what about I speak, just before GuyveR800 banishment."

The problem begins at this moment and has been many times discussed on MRC. The other events are the consequence of the banishment.

Since 2 months, I'm personnally convicted that there will never be a solution. That's why I've decided to stop with all discussions, attacks, critics, suggestions about this matter. But it's my right to regret the situation. And you can notice that I don't appreciate the bad words used recently by Snout and GuyveR800 ... not only Snout ... not only GuyveR800 ... but both persons.

Why is it you can't be more specific than that? Why is it you have yet to name a single of your accusations? Why is it you cannot give a simple example of "what we know"? Are you truly so unfair to us that you won't even say what it is we did? I really wonder why.....

what I see in the old discussions?

- G overreacting, flaming etc., again and again and again
- MRC applying short bans for bad language, not for the background of it

So exactly what does MRC do wrong towards G ?

Unless no-one can show me a list, there *is* no list .. simple as that ..

So we just have to assume there *is* a list? Even when no-one can show it? Sounds religious!

A: 'there is a god! really!'
B: 'prove it'
A: 'why should I?'
B: 'why should I believe you when you say there is a god then'
A: 'because it is true'


This is the perfect analogy!

I never said it's not your right to do what ever it is that pleases you most. All I did was ask you to please have a chat with me on IRC so we could talk about this issue. The fact that you refuse to do so tells me you must be very worried about what you would say in a 'face to face' conversation, probably because you have nothing to say. As usual, you fail to answer any of my questions. You fail to answer any questions regarding the matter. I know why, I just wanted everyone else to know why as well.

I never said you attacked MRC in the recent Aiky post. I only said that you seem to enjoy keeping these kinds of subjects under close attention at all times. Just when things have calmed down, you find the need to dig up an old 'war'. You say you regret the situation, but take every chance you get to remind people of it.

You keep saying MRC is unwilling to resolve the issue, yet you have absolutely no idea what happened, what MRC did or did not do, nor what MRC has or has not attempted to do to resolve or aggravate the issue. You made up your mind before knowing the facts, and now that you're slowly learning the facts, you're too embarrased to admit you might have been wrong. You are continually dismissive of MRC, negative in general, keep up digging old issues to see if you can somehow make matters worse, and have yet to point out a single thing MRC may have done to aggravate the matter.

When I ask you to 'meet in private', you refuse. And when I'm then forced to call you out in public, you don't wish to answer any of the questions you are asked and conveniently dismiss them with a "you know what I'm talking about". My dear friend, I do know what I am talking about. The question is: do you?

To answer to your last question : for me, all depends from the context, but of course I should also wait for excuses before to 'forget' the incident if the context can 'explain' an exaggerate reaction

For the rest, here's the text of my last private message :

"I don't think that you have read my last reactions very carefully. Since I'm convicted (and it's recent) that no any solution will resolve the problem, I've decided to simply regret the situation without entering again in a round of suggestions, critics, attacks, etc ... Constating and regretting a situation is not an attack, comparing the situation with politician's attitude is not an attack. As I've said, compromise is impossible. Both Snout and GuyveR800 have used very bad words in their recent messages, I must also regret it, because it's not the good way to go to a compromise. Read again my last phrase : what I say concerns also GuyveR800, not only Snout. So, I think that I try to be objective. And to come to the origin of the problem, three persons should present excuses before that a compromise should be possible. But again, it's impossible and too late (more than 1 year after the events)."

Eveyone can now try to understand your strange reading of my message.

I don't have refused this discussion, it can be done by private messages, but I'll never use IRC again.

So if you see my answer as negative, you're wrong. Excuse me, but you are twisting the reality.

On IRC, the discussion would be more dynamic tho .. better reply 10x on 10 single lines than 1x with w huge chunk o' text ..

Or are you affraid of Socrates-style questions?

It is good to see that Karoshi's forum is a warm place even in winter.  

This is a free forum and we want to keep it without moderation. Anyway, our main focus is game development. Perhaps all this extensive thread has not much to do with it, don't you think so?  

Please share the joy of playing the newest MSX games available and do not exploit the fun by continuing quarrels that were started a long time ago. Thank you.